NALFO Orgs. Changing Focus

[Monarca7]

I was looking at how many post I have compared to you all...I'm such a novice...lol I haven't even broke 100 yet!

[knight_shadow]

Originally Posted by Monarca7

I was looking at how many post I have compared to you all...I'm such a novice...lol I haven't even broke 100 yet!

I've been on this site for 8 years and talk too damn much lol

[Monarca7]

Originally Posted by knight_shadow

I've been on this site for 8 years and talk too damn much lol

lol

[DiamondAthena]

Interesting thread ppl! I am really interested in learning more about umbrella councils.

[Drolefille]

Originally Posted by knight_shadow

I've been on this site for 8 years and talk too damn much lol

We keep telling you to shut up, but it's not working!

#TeamSen

[Little Dragon]

As a member of one of the orgs that left NALFO, I think that NALFO's current situation is not due so much to some orgs changing their focus, as for the large difference in membership size between its member orgs. That is the main reason for the creation of NALFO in the first place, as many (not all) of its founding orgs could not meet the membership requirements for CNHL, which was composed of larger orgs.

I think LGLO/HLGLO's could work together well under the same council, if that council served as a trade organization. Those orgs are already well established, have a solid Alumni base, and may be looking, not so much at expansion (which of course they are) but at serving its members. Smaller orgs, be them LGLO or HLGLO, are looking towards achieving greater stability, still thinking their organizational structures, and expansion might be, although not necessarily, a greater priority.

NALFO's limitation on new orgs has lasted as long as it has due to NALFO's internal restructuring. It is very hard to find the right balance for its internal structure when each member org has a very different strategy in mind.

[Little Dragon]

By the way, I always enjoy Knight_Shadows comments.

[Monarca7]

Originally Posted by Little Dragon

As a member of one of the orgs that left NALFO, I think that NALFO's current situation is not due so much to some orgs changing their focus, as for the large difference in membership size between its member orgs. That is the main reason for the creation of NALFO in the first place, as many (not all) of its founding orgs could not meet the membership requirements for CNHL, which was composed of larger orgs.

I think LGLO/HLGLO's could work together well under the same council, if that council served as a trade organization. Those orgs are already well established, have a solid Alumni base, and may be looking, not so much at expansion (which of course they are) but at serving its members. Smaller orgs, be them LGLO or HLGLO, are looking towards achieving greater stability, still thinking their organizational structures, and expansion might be, although not necessarily, a greater priority.

NALFO's limitation on new orgs has lasted as long as it has due to NALFO's internal restructuring. It is very hard to find the right balance for its internal structure when each member org has a very different strategy in mind.

What do you mean by trade oraganization I thought NALFO already was a trade organization...again I haven't rearched this....lol trying to get work done today